DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY.
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
a | - ORS
. Docket No: 1908-13
oS ' 14 May 2014 -
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction: of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 November 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
ef your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful-and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence ‘of probable material
error (or injustice. che oo , .
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 2 March 1999.
On 5 October 1999 you were an unauthorized: absentee until your
return on 15 October 1999. “Your last: enlisted evaluation for
the period 16 July to 1 November 1999 showed that ou were not
recommended for retention. --On 1 November! 1999 you were released
from active duty under honorable conditions: by reason of
_ pregnancy or childbirth, and assigned an _ RE- -4 (riot recommended
for retention) HECHETY code.
The Board -caréfully’ considered your desire to continue your
career in the Navy; however, it was not persuaded that your RE-4
reentry Gens was assigned i in error, or that its continued
presence in your record is unjust due to your misconduct and
non-recommendation for retention. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
rt Deak
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01352-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is denied reenlistment due to HYT because he is serving in pay grade E-2. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05872-01
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 5 November 1993 for three years as a PNSN (E-3). At the time of your separation, E-4 was 10 years. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03796-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A review In this military bearing/character, and Your record further reflects that you received an adverse special enlisted performance evaluation for the period of 16 June to 12 November 2001 to document the removal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03288-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were so separated on 4 On 1 November 1999 you were processed for an In connection with this processing, You state in your application that you had personal problems and lied to the psychologist about your preservice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09577-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2009. You reenlisted in the Navy on 1 November 1995 after three years of prior honorable service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00494-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 June 1998 at age 18. In the evaluation for the period ending 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08561-98
_( A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board concluded that the assigned reenlistment code in this case Accordingly, was harmless error and does not warrant removal. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02294-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 November 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04708-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 12 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. failure to pay a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00303-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were 8 May 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 13-month period documenting three counselings and problems with your government credit card debt provided sufficient justify- cation for a non-recommendation for retention and assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. ...